IEM Sick and my stomach twisting at everyy faken religious matherfakers onhere! talkinng about! fuk you! an dyour saviour matherfake ri em budhist and their is no doom! we are warriors fighting the same fight ! their is no savious no one saves us but our selfs!
Comment by resistORserve44 — June 30, 2009 @ 6:32 pm
just because it didn’t happen on that day doesn’t mean that it won’t happen…sometimes plans get changed when things happen that can jeperdize the whole operation. so everyone should stay alert not on the operation but one what Jesus Christ is showing…just cause you know about operation black jack don’t mean your saved…if you die hell is still wating because you didn’t exepct Jesus Christ as you Lord and saviour…
Yes. I do really think that if JW wasn’t part of an establishment newspaper & published the slides in their exact same form on a personal website he would have been arrested & charged under one or more of those Acts some time ago.
I suggest contacting your MP & the police. Also set up a petition on “petitionsDOTnumber10DOTgovDOTuk” giving all the details & concerns you have above asking for the PM to condemn the irresponsible act & to consider demanding a prosecution against JW & the Telegraph
Wow, I had never heard about that before. I thought it was bad enough when I found out that Britain had dumped E-coli on the population to see how they would “react” to it. This is getting ridiculous.
Comment by spring1978ukma — June 30, 2009 @ 6:32 pm
Some may think it’s crazy to think The Telegraph would pass codes around, but they’ve been accused of it in the past, such as the “D-Day Crosswords”. There have been several other examples where codes have been purposely planted in the media, “entertainment” or public view to communicate secret messages to persons meant to see or hear them. Here are just a couple of examples:
Oh man, I am so sorry, I totally understand that fear and anxiety. Too bad the people at the telegraph dont. Apparently they have totally forgotten about 7/7/05. My brother in law was on one of those underground trains and we lost contact with him for over 6 hours. These idiots need to be held accountable. It is one thing to have a cartoon about it, but when they start coding it saying it is “not simply entertainment” and all the other stuff they pulled…nope, not funny anymore.
Comment by spring1978ukma — June 30, 2009 @ 6:32 pm
Oh, thank you for clearing that up. This is exactly the type of thing The Telegraph failed to consider b4 publishing fear mongering material, with coded messages telling their readers that their Blackjack story wasn’t “simply entertainment” & “Not all federal authorities are involved”, & then on top of all that, directed their readers to the Jackblack21 site, that had timers displayed, counting down to June 22, the exact month, day & time Blackjack said nukes would detonate – one where I live!
My husband’s family lives in London, I was up all night from Friday-Sunday night worried about it all. That is why I started researching it myself because I was so worried. I was crunching it all together and finding out what I could find out to warn them. It actually worried me MORE when I saw the domainbyproxy from OK because of the Oklahoma City bombings. I didnt even have the heart to tell my husband about it, he just thought I was losing it and I let him think that cause it was easier.
Comment by spring1978ukma — June 30, 2009 @ 6:32 pm
Yeah tell me about it. I’ve lost sleep & work due to stress & anxiety over the Telegraph’s fear mongering. I live in Los Angeles, one of Blackjack’s targets.
No, I only got one email but I THOUGHT I was only on 12, because I only went to the one that was listed on the Tele coded one… but I just looked at the sent folder in my email and it IS listed as JACKBLACK13dotINFOatdomainsbyproxydot com in my email. I think I am getting too old to remember things though…so please pardon me if I am getting this confused. Again, I thought that was the one I went to in the beginning. I wasn’t even aware that there were two until today when you told me.
Comment by spring1978ukma — June 30, 2009 @ 6:32 pm
spring1978ukma:
“I sent an email to the email address”
“he even said he was from OK”
Which person? “12″ or “13″ or both? If you have an email reply from 12 then perhaps you should consider posting a screen shot of it on your youtube channel to clear up any confusion? Are you saying you got a reply from 12 & 13, both using the same email addy replying back to you?
I guess maybe I just took HIS word for it when he said that jackblack13 was jackblack12. None the less, I still think that was fearmongering. ESPECIALLY when you have family that lives in the areas that he pointed out…
Comment by spring1978ukma — June 30, 2009 @ 6:32 pm
I know what all of that said because I was reading some of it as it happened. I told Earthlasthope about the website. I am the one that decoded it. (or should I say ONE of the ones that decoded it…) I can’t take any of the credit really because there was people BEFORE me that did it, but I didn’t know that they did it. I saw later in the thread that they had done it at either Icke’s website or Infowarriors website. I was on both at the time, so I can’t remember which.
Comment by spring1978ukma — June 30, 2009 @ 6:32 pm
No, you aren’t getting what I mean, when you do a whois, you get an email address for a domainsbyproxy FOR the person that made the website. I sent an email to the email address saying that was a “funny joke” WELL, the guy sent me email back, unbeknownst to HIM, it had his REAL email address on it, the one that he used to register the website at domainsbyproxy. I knew this guy was from OK before he even said he was from OK because that was where it was registered from.
Comment by spring1978ukma — June 30, 2009 @ 6:32 pm
Here’s the slide, as it appears on The Telegraph, telling people to go to jackblack12:
tinyurlDOTcom/m5gq9o
You can copy the code easily here, scroll down to “MESSAGE 2 DECODED” :
tinyurlDOTcom/me858d
Paste in HEX converter:
tinyurlDOTcom/d5xrxg
It reads:
“This is the final warng on this site – all further warnings will be given on jackblack12. info. Beware Ardent Sentry. Be alert for Semis bearing the sun icon. Not all federal authorities are involved”
That’s not the person’s personal info. That’s the company’s info who registered the site. which is responsible for registering millions of sites. Check the dates when they were registered. The 12 site was created only a few days after The Telegraph ran the Operation Blackjack story. The 13 site was only created AFTER people started breaking the codes just last week, that were posted on The Telegraph’s website telling the readers to go to Jackblack12DOTinfo.
Williams apparently began posting on message boards using anonymous names, hyping up the story, & feeding people ideas that it was more than fiction shortly after The Telegraph published Operation Blackjack. One of his names was “wisleybear”, who later admitted he was Justin Williams after being exposed. The user “wisleybear” is tied to Williams’ Digg account. Do a search for “wisleybear” & “I Just called the Telegraph about the Nuke Story “. You’ll find the message thread where he was exposed.
I did the whois on the website when it was jackblackinfo12. You should be able to see it on some of the websites that talk about it. It is the SAME info for jackblackinfo13. Same domainbyproxy, same listing. He might NOW say that he wasn’t doing it, but he was just because he is trying to save his butt. Like I said, he is JUST AS guilty as the Justin Williams character because his HOAX was propagating the whole thing.
Comment by spring1978ukma — June 30, 2009 @ 6:32 pm
No that’s not true at all. Here’s a quote from the person who created the “13″ site:
“So I was reading the dp at work on Friday when I had some downtime. Noticed some talk about jackblack12. info and how it had to be some kind of military psyop. So for kicks I registered jackblack13. info and put some gibberish on it.”
He admits that he made a copycat version of 12. And re his”13 is the real 12″. He’s just making fun of people, saying his site is the “real” one. It was created long after 12.
Please do not get me wrong, I do NOT think that Justin Williams is innocent in all of this, he is JUST AS guilty and he started it all. I think that they are in this together, one AS worse as the other. They fear mongered, no doubt in MY mind about that.
Comment by spring1978ukma — June 30, 2009 @ 6:32 pm
That is what I am talking about too, if you go to jackblack13dot info right now, you will see the guy that did it admits it, and at the bottom of the page he says that jackblack12dot info was the same as jackblack13dotinfo and how he did all of it. I think that he played Justin Williams on the website but it wasn’t Justin Williams that made that website, people just PRESUMED that Justin did it on infowarrior and David Icke websites.
Look this up on youtube: jackblack13 is the real jackblack12
Comment by spring1978ukma — June 30, 2009 @ 6:32 pm
I was talking about Jackblack12DOTinfo. It was created within days of the The Telegraph’s publication of Operation Blackjack in January 2009, and is also referenced on slides of that publication. The “13″ website and at least one other that I know of were copycats as I understand, by people not affiliated with Williams or The Telegraph. Justin Williams apparently took credit for the Jackblack12 site.on message boards he was posting on anonymously to hype up Blackjack as being more than fiction.
IEM Sick and my stomach twisting at everyy faken religious matherfakers onhere! talkinng about! fuk you! an dyour saviour matherfake ri em budhist and their is no doom! we are warriors fighting the same fight ! their is no savious no one saves us but our selfs!
Comment by resistORserve44 — June 30, 2009 @ 6:32 pm
just because it didn’t happen on that day doesn’t mean that it won’t happen…sometimes plans get changed when things happen that can jeperdize the whole operation. so everyone should stay alert not on the operation but one what Jesus Christ is showing…just cause you know about operation black jack don’t mean your saved…if you die hell is still wating because you didn’t exepct Jesus Christ as you Lord and saviour…
Comment by starling7777 — June 30, 2009 @ 6:32 pm
At 4:12 I said twice that the site is called jackblack12 but the MI5 said blackjack12
Comment by 91177info — June 30, 2009 @ 6:32 pm
Yes. I do really think that if JW wasn’t part of an establishment newspaper & published the slides in their exact same form on a personal website he would have been arrested & charged under one or more of those Acts some time ago.
I suggest contacting your MP & the police. Also set up a petition on “petitionsDOTnumber10DOTgovDOTuk” giving all the details & concerns you have above asking for the PM to condemn the irresponsible act & to consider demanding a prosecution against JW & the Telegraph
Comment by majg12uk — June 30, 2009 @ 6:32 pm
Wow, I had never heard about that before. I thought it was bad enough when I found out that Britain had dumped E-coli on the population to see how they would “react” to it. This is getting ridiculous.
Comment by spring1978ukma — June 30, 2009 @ 6:32 pm
Some may think it’s crazy to think The Telegraph would pass codes around, but they’ve been accused of it in the past, such as the “D-Day Crosswords”. There have been several other examples where codes have been purposely planted in the media, “entertainment” or public view to communicate secret messages to persons meant to see or hear them. Here are just a couple of examples:
Britain cracked WW2 spies’ secret “dress code”
tinyurlDOTcom/nl57vf
BBC broadcasts coded messages
tinyurlDOTcom/lft32x
Comment by StevenM818 — June 30, 2009 @ 6:32 pm
Oh man, I am so sorry,
I totally understand that fear and anxiety. Too bad the people at the telegraph dont. Apparently they have totally forgotten about 7/7/05. My brother in law was on one of those underground trains and we lost contact with him for over 6 hours. These idiots need to be held accountable. It is one thing to have a cartoon about it, but when they start coding it saying it is “not simply entertainment” and all the other stuff they pulled…nope, not funny anymore.
Comment by spring1978ukma — June 30, 2009 @ 6:32 pm
Oh, thank you for clearing that up. This is exactly the type of thing The Telegraph failed to consider b4 publishing fear mongering material, with coded messages telling their readers that their Blackjack story wasn’t “simply entertainment” & “Not all federal authorities are involved”, & then on top of all that, directed their readers to the Jackblack21 site, that had timers displayed, counting down to June 22, the exact month, day & time Blackjack said nukes would detonate – one where I live!
Comment by StevenM818 — June 30, 2009 @ 6:32 pm
My husband’s family lives in London, I was up all night from Friday-Sunday night worried about it all. That is why I started researching it myself because I was so worried. I was crunching it all together and finding out what I could find out to warn them. It actually worried me MORE when I saw the domainbyproxy from OK because of the Oklahoma City bombings. I didnt even have the heart to tell my husband about it, he just thought I was losing it and I let him think that cause it was easier.
Comment by spring1978ukma — June 30, 2009 @ 6:32 pm
Yeah tell me about it. I’ve lost sleep & work due to stress & anxiety over the Telegraph’s fear mongering. I live in Los Angeles, one of Blackjack’s targets.
Comment by StevenM818 — June 30, 2009 @ 6:32 pm
No, I only got one email but I THOUGHT I was only on 12, because I only went to the one that was listed on the Tele coded one… but I just looked at the sent folder in my email and it IS listed as JACKBLACK13dotINFOatdomainsbyproxydot com in my email. I think I am getting too old to remember things though…so please pardon me if I am getting this confused. Again, I thought that was the one I went to in the beginning. I wasn’t even aware that there were two until today when you told me.
Comment by spring1978ukma — June 30, 2009 @ 6:32 pm
spring1978ukma:
“I sent an email to the email address”
“he even said he was from OK”
Which person? “12″ or “13″ or both? If you have an email reply from 12 then perhaps you should consider posting a screen shot of it on your youtube channel to clear up any confusion? Are you saying you got a reply from 12 & 13, both using the same email addy replying back to you?
Comment by StevenM818 — June 30, 2009 @ 6:32 pm
I guess maybe I just took HIS word for it when he said that jackblack13 was jackblack12. None the less, I still think that was fearmongering. ESPECIALLY when you have family that lives in the areas that he pointed out…
Comment by spring1978ukma — June 30, 2009 @ 6:32 pm
I know what all of that said because I was reading some of it as it happened. I told Earthlasthope about the website. I am the one that decoded it. (or should I say ONE of the ones that decoded it…) I can’t take any of the credit really because there was people BEFORE me that did it, but I didn’t know that they did it. I saw later in the thread that they had done it at either Icke’s website or Infowarriors website. I was on both at the time, so I can’t remember which.
Comment by spring1978ukma — June 30, 2009 @ 6:32 pm
No, you aren’t getting what I mean, when you do a whois, you get an email address for a domainsbyproxy FOR the person that made the website. I sent an email to the email address saying that was a “funny joke” WELL, the guy sent me email back, unbeknownst to HIM, it had his REAL email address on it, the one that he used to register the website at domainsbyproxy. I knew this guy was from OK before he even said he was from OK because that was where it was registered from.
Comment by spring1978ukma — June 30, 2009 @ 6:32 pm
Here’s the slide, as it appears on The Telegraph, telling people to go to jackblack12:
tinyurlDOTcom/m5gq9o
You can copy the code easily here, scroll down to “MESSAGE 2 DECODED” :
tinyurlDOTcom/me858d
Paste in HEX converter:
tinyurlDOTcom/d5xrxg
It reads:
“This is the final warng on this site – all further warnings will be given on jackblack12. info. Beware Ardent Sentry. Be alert for Semis bearing the sun icon. Not all federal authorities are involved”
Jackblack12 was from The Telegraph.
Comment by StevenM818 — June 30, 2009 @ 6:32 pm
That’s not the person’s personal info. That’s the company’s info who registered the site. which is responsible for registering millions of sites. Check the dates when they were registered. The 12 site was created only a few days after The Telegraph ran the Operation Blackjack story. The 13 site was only created AFTER people started breaking the codes just last week, that were posted on The Telegraph’s website telling the readers to go to Jackblack12DOTinfo.
Comment by StevenM818 — June 30, 2009 @ 6:32 pm
Williams apparently began posting on message boards using anonymous names, hyping up the story, & feeding people ideas that it was more than fiction shortly after The Telegraph published Operation Blackjack. One of his names was “wisleybear”, who later admitted he was Justin Williams after being exposed. The user “wisleybear” is tied to Williams’ Digg account. Do a search for “wisleybear” & “I Just called the Telegraph about the Nuke Story “. You’ll find the message thread where he was exposed.
Comment by StevenM818 — June 30, 2009 @ 6:32 pm
I did the whois on the website when it was jackblackinfo12. You should be able to see it on some of the websites that talk about it. It is the SAME info for jackblackinfo13. Same domainbyproxy, same listing. He might NOW say that he wasn’t doing it, but he was just because he is trying to save his butt. Like I said, he is JUST AS guilty as the Justin Williams character because his HOAX was propagating the whole thing.
Comment by spring1978ukma — June 30, 2009 @ 6:32 pm
No that’s not true at all. Here’s a quote from the person who created the “13″ site:
“So I was reading the dp at work on Friday when I had some downtime. Noticed some talk about jackblack12. info and how it had to be some kind of military psyop. So for kicks I registered jackblack13. info and put some gibberish on it.”
He admits that he made a copycat version of 12. And re his”13 is the real 12″. He’s just making fun of people, saying his site is the “real” one. It was created long after 12.
Comment by StevenM818 — June 30, 2009 @ 6:32 pm
Please look up:
The law as regard bomb hoaxes
Computer Misuse Act 1990
Telecommunications Act
Comment by 91177info — June 30, 2009 @ 6:32 pm
Please do not get me wrong, I do NOT think that Justin Williams is innocent in all of this, he is JUST AS guilty and he started it all. I think that they are in this together, one AS worse as the other. They fear mongered, no doubt in MY mind about that.
Comment by spring1978ukma — June 30, 2009 @ 6:32 pm
That is what I am talking about too, if you go to jackblack13dot info right now, you will see the guy that did it admits it, and at the bottom of the page he says that jackblack12dot info was the same as jackblack13dotinfo and how he did all of it. I think that he played Justin Williams on the website but it wasn’t Justin Williams that made that website, people just PRESUMED that Justin did it on infowarrior and David Icke websites.
Look this up on youtube: jackblack13 is the real jackblack12
Comment by spring1978ukma — June 30, 2009 @ 6:32 pm
I was talking about Jackblack12DOTinfo. It was created within days of the The Telegraph’s publication of Operation Blackjack in January 2009, and is also referenced on slides of that publication. The “13″ website and at least one other that I know of were copycats as I understand, by people not affiliated with Williams or The Telegraph. Justin Williams apparently took credit for the Jackblack12 site.on message boards he was posting on anonymously to hype up Blackjack as being more than fiction.
Comment by StevenM818 — June 30, 2009 @ 6:32 pm
The website jackblack13info is still up, the guy that did it admits to it on the website, it wasn’t Justin Williams.
Comment by spring1978ukma — June 30, 2009 @ 6:32 pm